The term cost-effective is not unfamiliar to us. Many people will compare products with each other when shopping, and then choose the most cost-effective instrument industry. When we purchase instruments, we compare the same products and select the most cost-effective ones. The price/performance ratio is a proportional relationship between the performance and price of a product. However, what is the true cost performance of the instrument? How is the performance of the instrument determined? Many buyers will feel that it is the function of the instrument. Is this understanding correct? The small series of China Chemical Instrument Network and your instruments have opened the veil of the cost-effectiveness of instrument products.
In the instrument industry, many people still take it for granted that the ratio of product and function to price is a price/performance ratio. At first glance, this argument is correct, but it is not the case in the deep. Instrument products and other products have great differences, especially analytical instruments, analytical instruments are mostly used for testing, the accuracy of the test data and the quality of the instrument are closely related, so the instrument's detection accuracy and test results stability is the instrument performance The main manifestation. In other words, the performance of an instrument does not depend on how many detection functions it has, but on the accuracy of the detection and the stability of the detection results.
Many people will say that the detection accuracy of their products in the market is similar, so their price/performance ratio is similar. This statement is correct for most of the commodities on the market, but this analysis seems to be inadequate for analytical instruments. Most products have a certain amount of wear in the over-weighing used. Aging and other phenomena, but will not affect the use. What kind of problems can be caused by the wear and tear of instrument products? The most common reason is that the test data is inaccurate. For most tests, data inaccuracy is not just a matter of error, it can make detection and experimentation meaningless. In other words, if the test data of an instrument is inaccurate and the repeatability is not strong, it means that the instrument has lost its significance.
Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of our purchasing equipment is not only the product function and the price ratio, but also the effective service life of the product. Instead of just looking at the immediate product and price, it is more necessary to consider the stability and accuracy of the test results after a certain period of use. This is the true manifestation of the cost performance of instrument products.
In the instrument industry, many people still take it for granted that the ratio of product and function to price is a price/performance ratio. At first glance, this argument is correct, but it is not the case in the deep. Instrument products and other products have great differences, especially analytical instruments, analytical instruments are mostly used for testing, the accuracy of the test data and the quality of the instrument are closely related, so the instrument's detection accuracy and test results stability is the instrument performance The main manifestation. In other words, the performance of an instrument does not depend on how many detection functions it has, but on the accuracy of the detection and the stability of the detection results.
Many people will say that the detection accuracy of their products in the market is similar, so their price/performance ratio is similar. This statement is correct for most of the commodities on the market, but this analysis seems to be inadequate for analytical instruments. Most products have a certain amount of wear in the over-weighing used. Aging and other phenomena, but will not affect the use. What kind of problems can be caused by the wear and tear of instrument products? The most common reason is that the test data is inaccurate. For most tests, data inaccuracy is not just a matter of error, it can make detection and experimentation meaningless. In other words, if the test data of an instrument is inaccurate and the repeatability is not strong, it means that the instrument has lost its significance.
Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of our purchasing equipment is not only the product function and the price ratio, but also the effective service life of the product. Instead of just looking at the immediate product and price, it is more necessary to consider the stability and accuracy of the test results after a certain period of use. This is the true manifestation of the cost performance of instrument products.